On the Duty of Civil Disobedience
- Language
- EN
- Format
- EPUB
- Size
- 104 KB
Description
Henry David Thoreau examines the moral responsibilities of individuals concerning government authority, emphasising personal conscience over legal compliance. Published in 1849, the essay criticises governments that perpetuate injustice, particularly referencing slavery and the Mexican-American War, which Thoreau opposed. He argues that citizens should resist unjust laws through nonviolent means and that passive obedience enables systemic wrongs. The work questions the legitimacy of government power when it fails to promote justice, advocating instead for civil disobedience as a form of protest rooted in moral conviction. As a foundational text, it has influenced social and political movements advocating nonviolent resistance and civil rights. Thoreau’s critique reflects the political thought of the mid-19th century in America and remains relevant as a moral argument for individual action against injustice.
From the opening pages
I heartily accept the motto,—“That government is best which governs least;” and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and systematically. Carried out, it finally amounts to this, which also I believe—“That government is best which governs not at all;” and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which they will have. Government is at best but an expedient; but most governments are usually, and all governments are sometimes, inexpedient. The objections which have been brought against a standing army, and they are many and weighty, and deserve to prevail, may also at last be brought against a standing government. The standing army is only an arm of the standing government. The government itself, which is only the mode which the people have chosen to execute their will, is equally liable to be abused and perverted before the people can act through it. Witness the present Mexican war, the work of comparatively a few individuals using the standing government as their tool; for, in the outset, the people would not have consented to this measure. This American government,—what is it but a tradition, though a recent one, endeavoring to transmit itself unimpaired to posterity, but each instant losing some of its integrity? It has not the vitality and force of a single living man; for a single man can bend it to his will. It is a sort of wooden gun to the people themselves; and, if ever they should use it in earnest as a real one against each other, it will surely split. But it is not the less necessary for this; for the people must have some complicated machinery or other, and hear its din, to satisfy that idea of government which they have. Governments show thus how successfully men can be imposed on, even impose on themselves, for their own advantage. It is excellent, we must all allow; yet this government never of itself furthered any enterprise, but by the alacrity with which it got out of its way. It does not keep the country free. It does not settle the West. It does not educate. The character inherent in the American people has done all that has been accomplished; and it would have done somewhat more, if the government had not sometimes got in its way. For government is an expedient, by which men would…
Ask about this book
An AI guide answers your questions about this title
FAQ
Is "On the Duty of Civil Disobedience" free to download?
Yes, it is free to download — no sign up needed.
What format is the file?
EPUB.
More by Henry David Thoreau
Similar books
Reader reviews Be the first
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this book.
Write a review
Protected by reCAPTCHA.